MEMS/Micromachining
Viewpoints
2010
-
August:
-
July:
Competing Technology: Camera-Based Motion Sensor in Microsoft Kinect
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
2009
-
December/January:
2009: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2010 -
November:
Recent Developments: Qualcomm Ups the Ante with Mirasol-Based E-Book Readers
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
2008
-
December/January:
2008: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2009 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
Archived Viewpoints
2007
-
December/January:
2007: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2008 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
2006
-
December/January:
2006: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2007 -
Before December 2006, the MEMS/Micromachining technology area was Micromachining. The name changed in order to reflect better the focus of the Technology Map coverage.
-
November:
Difficulties in Aerospace MEMS
Recent Developments: Printed Optoelectronics and Microfluidics -
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
EAPs: From New Microactuators to Artificial Muscle
New Technology Area: Connected Homes -
May:
Developments in Micromachined RF Devices and Silicon Microphones
-
April:
Areas to Monitor: MEMS Industry Structure: Recent Developments | U.K. Foundry Access
-
March:
-
February:
2005
-
December/January:
2005: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2006 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
Recent Developments: RF MEMS: Sawtek Responds | Finally Commercial: MEMS-based Humidity Sensor
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
ZigBee and Wireless Motes
Microreformers for Portable Fuel Cells -
March:
-
February:
MEMS Relays in Defense Applications and Beyond
Recent Developments: Micromachined Interconnects
2004
-
December/January:
2004: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2005 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
RF MEMS Business Models
Recent Developments: Accelerometers as Human-Computer Interfaces -
February:
2003
-
December/January:
2003: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2004 -
November:
Commercializing Micromachined RF Components
Announcement: Next Generation Technologies -
October:
MEMS Flow-Control Update
Recent Developments: Discera and Dalsa -
September:
Japanese MEMS Players
Commercial Development Parameters: NEDO MEMS Update -
August:
SoC, Wireless MEMS, and the Role of Small Companies
Recent Developments: HSARPA -
July:
MEMS As a Tool for Parallel Production
Players: Redwood Microsystems -
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
Recent Developments: MEMS for Optical Storage at OPT 2002 | Foundry Alliances in RF MEMS
2002
-
December/January:
2002: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2003 -
November:
Applications Review
Recent Developments: Motorola's Asset Light Strategy for Sensors -
October:
Unprofitability Drives Consolidation
Recent Developments: Analog Devices Increases the Value Add -
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
The End of FEDs?
Recent Developments: Expansions in MEMS Manufacturing -
February:
Ardesta
Recent Developments: Silicon Light Machines and Lightconnect
2001
-
December/January:
2001: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2002 -
November:
Disk-Drive Actuators
Recent Developments: Moves in Accelerometer Technology -
October:
Minatec
The Technology in Brief: Micro EDM: A Mix-and-Match Technology -
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
MEMS Developments at Intel and ST
Recent Developments: 3G Networks -
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
2000
-
December/January:
2000: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2001 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
Power Sources and MEMS
Recent Developments: IMM Microreactor for Combinatorial Chemistry -
April:
-
March:
-
February:
1999
-
December/January:
1999: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 2000 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
Before August 1999, the Explorer service was called TechMonitoring, and Viewpoints were TechLinks.
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
1998
-
December/January:
1998: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 1999 -
November:
-
October:
Recent Developments: Integrated Acceleration Sensors | Manufacturing Expansion at VTI
-
September:
-
August:
MEMStek's Demise
Recent Developments: Kodak's Ceramic Molding Process -
July:
-
June:
MIT's Miniature Turbine
Recent Developments: MEMS-Based Active Fiber Alignment Systems -
May:
-
April:
Piezo-Based Inkjet Printing
Recent Developments: IBM's SU-8 Resist -
March:
-
February:
Motorola to Quit the Chemical Sensors Business
Recent Developments: RIE for Edge-Emitting Lasers
1997
-
December/January:
1997: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 1998 -
November:
-
October:
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
Lithographic Microfiltration Membranes from Aquamarijn | The End of Inert Matter?: A Personal View
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
Micromachined Silicon Gyroscopes: First Applications and Timing
-
February:
1996
-
December/January:
1996: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 1997 -
November:
Micromachining: Changing Paradigms or Enforcing the Status Quo?
-
October:
Bosch's Foundry Service | OBD to Aid Micromachined Exhaust Gas Sensors | Silicon HVAC Sensors
-
September:
-
August:
-
July:
-
June:
-
May:
-
April:
-
March:
-
February:
-
December/January:
1995: The Year in Review
Look for These Developments in 1996
About This Technology
Industry continuously strives to make products that are smaller and lighter, are lower cost, yet have increased functionality. Micromachining is the ability to make components and devices whose features measure in the tens to hundreds of microns and, in some cases, even 100 nanometers. Microelectromechanical systems, or MEMS, are a class of devices or microsystems produced using micromachining technology. Initially, scientists borrowed lithography techniques for making two-dimensional integrated circuits from the electronics industry to micromachine simple three-dimensional cavities and freestanding membranes and cantilevers for sensor applications. Not only are microsensors smaller than conventional sensors, a characteristic that allows more functions in the same space, but they can also respond more quickly and more accurately, because of the smaller distances in use. Moreover, producing them in large batches is inexpensive. The extension of lithography methods and development of new micromachining techniques have allowed the production of freely moving micromechanical parts.
The biggest current market for micromachining is in sensors, from solid-state pressure sensors to automotive accelerometers. Also, the manufacture of many components in existing instruments and office equipment—such as the tiny nozzles in ink-jet printer heads, slider components for hard-disk drives, and the tips for atomic-force microscopes—relies on micromachining techniques. Micromachining has enabled cell phones to incorporate multiple functions, and MEMS-based microphones are quickly replacing traditional microphones in cell phones.
Micromachining is producing fluidic channels for DNA chips, allowing massive parallelism for high-throughput screening techniques, and is reducing some analytical instruments to handheld size.In the longer term, micromachining will contribute to implantable drug-delivery systems and other biomedical devices; tiny mechanical parts may allow the emergence of microrobots that can perform work in very small spaces, including those in the human body.
Almost every industry will enjoy the benefits of micromachining, particularly the information technology, telecommunications, automotive, and health-care industries. The relatively low cost of microsensors—$1 to $20 each—will also allow manufacturers to use sensors in many more products than they can now including consumer-electronics products, home appliances, toys, and products for home health care. These sensors and other micromechanical devices will eventually have remote powering and connect to the Internet, allowing remote interrogation of industrial sensors, connection of home health-care devices to a physician's office, and remote control of in vitro biomedical devices. At some time in the decade leading to 2020, the micromachining industry will contend with nanotechnology. MEMS devices already incorporate nanometer-scale particles and structures as sensor elements, but micromachining processes are likely to incorporate additional alternative concepts such as molecular manufacturing and self-assembly.


